Traffic Violation Lawyers Attorneys – Getting The Best

This Blog was brought to you by the San Antonio’s Attorney for Traffic Violations Gordon Slade 210-820-3033

Traffic Violation Lawyers Attorneys – Getting The Best

Traffic Violation Lawyers are not challenging to find, but finding the absolute best Traffic Violation Lawyers are. And when you are faced with a traffic violation problem, you need the best attorney or lawyers to help you out of the impending jam. This website provides tips about getting the right Traffic Violation Lawyers and information to help you understand the various traffic violation laws.

About Traffic Violations Laws
Traffic or moving violations relate to any law violation committed by the driver of a vehicle while driving or parked. Common traffic violations come under infractions or misdemeanors. The serious ones can, however, even be considered felonies. The non-moving and moving traffic violations are the two kinds of traffic violations. Most traffic violations are looked upon as minor criminal offenses. However, there are those of serious nature, like ‘driving while intoxicated’ or DWI or ‘driving under the influence’ (of alcohol and other drugs) or D.U.I. Again, there can be minor mechanical or speeding violations that can have serious consequences. This may even lead to the license being suspended if several infractions occur over a short period. The fine listed on the face of the ticket issued for a traffic violation may frequently require to be paid. There also raises the possibility of vehicle insurance premiums increasing.

The standard moving violations or traffic violations that may require legal action are:
Exceeding the speed limit or speeding (this is the most common violation).
Driving too slowly, particularly in the left-hand lane.
Running by ignoring a stop sign or red traffic light.
Not yielding to another vehicle with the right-of-way.
Failing to maintain a single lane.
Crossing over a center divider.
Not using a seat belt when it is compulsory.
Failing to stop at a crosswalk to allow pedestrians to cross.
Failing to stop for a school bus while children are boarding or exiting.
Driving in a carpool lane when it is illegal to do so.

The moving severe traffic violations are drunk and reckless driving, road rage, street racing, and vehicular homicide.
The non-moving traffic violations usually involve illegal parking, parking in a posted non-parking zone, or at an expired meter.

There can be civil traffic violations and criminal traffic violations. A civil traffic infraction is a non-criminal charge that can be disposed of by payment of a civil penalty, requesting a court hearing, or election of a defensive driving course. On the other hand, a criminal traffic offense may be offenses such as D.U.I./DWI, fleeing a police officer, or leaving the scene of an accident. This requires a court appearance, unlike most civil traffic violation cases where court appearances are rare except when the violation involves serious bodily injury or death of another person. Criminal traffic offenses carry criminal penalties, including fines, court costs, and even jail terms.

In all traffic violation cases, the services and help of a Traffic Violations Lawyer become quite a necessity. You must check out the attorney directory’s concerned lawyers specializing in traffic violations. A traffic violation lawyer must be contacted before appearing in court about traffic or speeding violations. Only the traffic violation attorney can adequately assess the current situation you may be in and advise you to bring about a professional resolution to the traffic violation.

Car Accident Attorneys – Personal Injury Law

Car Accident Attorneys – Personal Injury Law

In some instances, the collision might be because of driver error, while mechanical defects concerning the bus or other vehicles may be to blame in different cases. However careful you are, a car crash can happen and change many things for you. More on this website
If you’re attentive to the steps you should take after a car crash, you will be better prepared to guard yourself and your passengers from injury and be conscious of what you should do to protect yourself against unfair claims.

Experiencing an automobile accident could impact your physical and psychological well-being. Many things can occur in a car accident that may make it necessary to contact a lawyer. If you have been in a car crash that has caused you injury, speak to an accident lawyer.

There may be many different explanations for why a bus accident can occur. School bus accidents are sometimes horrible tragedies for anybody involved and must be handled with much care. A car collision lawyer isn’t just concerned with representing your vehicle accident case. He also ensures that you’re in a secure position. Hiring an auto accident lawyer will allow you to get a positive outcome. Obviously, in a vehicle accident, you need a car crash attorney.

When you’re in an auto collision other than a minor fender bender, you will require legal assistance, so you will have the finest legal defense, particularly when it is a major collision. In some cases, they only result in property damage, but one in three accidents results in injury. When you seek the services of a car accident lawyer, you can expect them to attempt to get you compensation for those expenses resulting from the crash. A Texas automobile incident lawyer might be able to assist you in recovering the damages to which you’re entitled with minimal inconvenience to you. You should meet with more than one automobile accident lawyer to pick the best one for your own private case. A car accident attorney can request an investigation to ascertain how just the crash occurred. Above all else, the most significant action to take is to take the advice of your car collision attorney. Whatever the circumstances, you have to employ an automobile accident lawyer. Once an automobile crash lawyer has chosen to take on your case, they will go into action. Your car collision lawyer will do a good deal of research to prepare your case for the best outcome.

Injury & Wrongful Death Lawyers: Accidents Involving Trucks with Flatbed Trailers

Injury & Wrongful Death Lawyers: Accidents Involving Trucks with Flatbed Trailers: Personal Injury Attorney: Have you been injured in an accident with a flatbed trailer truck? The trucking accident attorneys in our firm can help you.

Texas is a hotbed of activity for trucking accidents and injuries of all varieties including accidents involving trucks with flatbed trailers. Flatbed trailers are generally employed to transport large and massive items that would not ordinarily fit into a standard cargo container. Far too often, these vehicles are used to transport cargo that is even too large for the trailer.

This creates a possibility for a unique type of accident. Most commonly, flatbed trailers can cause accidents whereby the cargo falls off of the trailer and collides with another motorist. Again, these trailers generally transport massive cargo, and such a collision can prove devastating for the car’s occupants, unfortunate to differ from the displaced cargo.

There may be several potential defendants in the case in such an event. Naturally, the truck driver and their insurance company will bare a considerable portion of liability in the accident. Additionally, another company may have been responsible for loading and securing the cargo, which would make them a likely defendant.

In cases where the cargo fell from the flatbed due to a collision with another vehicle, that vehicle may also be liable for causing the accident.

Furthermore, if the event that the cargo is forced from the vehicle due to a collision with an overpass, trees, a power line, etc. the parties responsible for designating the driver’s route may also be to blame. Our Texas flatbed and trailer accident lawyers are here to ensure that you receive the compensation deserve. Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases $1,000,000.00 Recovery – Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man’s vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were vastly underinsured and were not financially solvent.

Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent on filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.

Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite our attorneys’ insurmountable liability arguments. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone. However, it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.

Additionally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assassination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant’s insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant’s insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed when they refused to settle.

Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers’ Demand with a brief time window for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier’s exposure under the Stowers’ Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.

The defendant’s attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney’s threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney’s advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.

Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm that did not have our specific track record or who would not have recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the clients would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had the right of first refusal.

The logical implication of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.